first version colpali optimization demo

qdrant-landing/content/blog/colpali-optimization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+---
+title: "Optimizing ColPali for Retrieval at Scale, 13x Faster Results"
+draft: false
+slug: colpali-qdrant-optimization # Change this slug to your page slug if needed
+short_description:  Learn how we optimized ColPali, a document retrieval system, to be 13x faster for datasets of 20,000+ PDFs. Discover how pooling and reranking boost scalability while maintaining precision. # Change this
+description: ColPali combines text and visual contexts for precise document retrieval, but scaling posed challenges. We achieved 13x faster retrieval using pooling and reranking, reducing vector counts by ~30x while retaining near-original accuracy. Explore the open-source demo to optimize your retrieval workflows! # Change this
+
+preview_image: /blog/colpali-optimization/preview-2.png # Change this
+social_preview_image: /blog/colpali-optimization/preview-2.png # Optional image used for link previews
+# title_preview_image: /blog/Article-Image.png # Optional image used for blog post title
+# small_preview_image: /blog/colpali-optimization.png # Optional image used for small preview in the list of blog posts
+
+date: 2024-11-27T00:40:24-03:00
+author: Evgeniya Sukhodolskaya # Change this
+featured: yes # if true, this post will be featured on the blog page
+tags: # Change this, related by tags posts will be shown on the blog page
+  - colpali
+  - reranker
+  - optimization
+  - qdrant
+  - quantization
+  - multimodal
+
+
+---
+
+ColPali is a fascinating leap in document retrieval. Its precision in handling visually rich PDFs is phenomenal, but scaling it to handle real-world datasets is of course not without computational challenges. 
+
+Here's how we solved these challenges to make ColPali 13x faster without sacrificing the precision it’s known for.
+
+## The Scaling Dilemma
+
+ColPali generates **~1,030 vectors for just one page of a PDF.** While this is manageable for small-scale tasks, in a real-world production setting where you may need to store hundreds od thousands of PDFs, the challenge of scaling becomes significant.
+
+Consider this scenario:
+
+- **Dataset Size:** 20,000 PDF pages.
+- **Vector Explosion:** Each page generates ~1,030 vectors of 128 dimensions.
+- **Index Complexity:** Trillions of comparisons to build the index comparing every vector pair.
+
+Even advanced indexing algorithms like **HNSW** struggle with this scale, as computational costs grow quadratically. 
+
+We turned to a hybrid optimization strategy combining **pooling** (to reduce computational overhead) and **reranking** (to preserve accuracy).
+
+Before we go any deeper, watch our [Webinar video](https://www.youtube.com/live/_h6SN1WwnLs?si=n8gwiIjJ5dnfucXC) for the full demo walkthrough.
+<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_h6SN1WwnLs?si=HqJTcwDbdk4j_L0Y&amp;start=922" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
+
+For those eager to explore, the [codebase is available here](https://github.com/qdrant/demo-colpali-optimized).
+
+
+## Two-Stage Retrieval Process
+
+### Pooling
+
+Pooling is well-known in machine learning as a way to compress data while keeping important information intact. For ColPali, we reduced ~1,030 vectors per page to just 38 vectors by pooling rows in the document's 32x32 grid.
+
+The most popular types of pooling are:
+
+- **Mean Pooling:** Averages values across rows.
+- **Max Pooling:** Selects the maximum value for each feature.
+
+32 vectors represent the pooled rows, while an additional 6 vectors encode contextual information derived from ColPali’s special tokens (e.g., <bos> for the beginning of the sequence, and task-specific instructions like “Describe the image”).
+
+For our experiments, we chose to preserve these 6 additional vectors.
+
+### The "ColPali as a Reranker" Experiment
+
+Pooling drastically reduces retrieval costs, but there’s a risk of losing fine-grained precision. To address this, we implemented a **two-stage retrieval system** with the pooled vectors for the initial retrieval stage and the original ColPali model for reranking:
+
+1. **Pooled Retrieval:** Quickly retrieves the top 200 candidates using lightweight pooled embeddings.
+2. **Full Reranking:** Refines these candidates using the original, high-resolution embeddings, delivering the final top 20 results.
+
+This approach delivers speed without compromising on retrieval quality.
+
+### Implementation
+
+We created a custom dataset with over 20,000 unique PDF pages by merging:
+
+- **ViDoRe Benchmark:** Designed for document retrieval evaluation.
+- **UFO Dataset:** Visually rich documents paired with synthetic queries.
+- **DocVQA Dataset:** A large set of document-derived Q&A pairs.
+
+Each document was processed into 32x32 grids, generating both full-resolution and pooled embeddings. 
+
+![](/blog/colpali-optimization/rows.png)
+
+These embeddings were stored in the **Qdrant vector database**, configured for speed:
+
+- **Full-Resolution Embeddings:** ~1,030 vectors per page.
+- **Pooled Embeddings:** Mean and max pooling variants.
+
+All embeddings were kept in RAM to ensure consistent retrieval performance.
+
+
+### Experiment Setup
+
+We evaluated retrieval quality using 1,000 task-specific queries and the retrieval process followed the two-stage approach:
+1. **Pooled embeddings** retrieved the top 200 candidates.
+2. **Full-resolution embeddings** reranked these candidates to produce the final top 20 results.
+
+To measure performance, we used:
+
+- **NDCG@20:** Measures ranking quality (how well the top results align with expectations).
+- **Recall@20:** Measures the overlap between pooled and full-resolution retrievals.
+
+## Results
+
+The experiments gave us some very promissing results:
+
+- **Speed:** Retrieval time improved **13x** compared to full-resolution embeddings alone.
+- **Accuracy:** Mean pooling preserved retrieval quality nearly identical to the original ColPali.
+
+### Metrics
+
+| Pooling Type | NDCG@20 | Recall@20 |
+|--------------|---------|-----------|
+| **Mean**     | 0.952   | 0.917     |
+| **Max**      | 0.759   | 0.656     |
+
+
+Mean pooling offered the ideal balance, combining speed and precision, while max pooling delivered faster results but at the cost of noticeable quality degradation.
+
+### Other Insights
+
+We also explored additional optimizations, including removing `<pad>` tokens, which slightly improved speed without significant quality loss, and applying binary quantization, which increased retrieval speed but introduced minor accuracy drops.
+
+## What’s Next?
+Future experiments could push these results even further:
+
+- Investigating column-wise pooling for additional compression.
+- Testing hybrid half-precision (float16) vectors to balance memory use and speed.
+- Skipping special multivectors during prefetch to streamline retrieval.
+- Combining quantization with oversampling for even faster search.
+
+
+### Try It Yourself
+
+Curious to see this in action? Explore the full codebase and experiment with ColPali optimizations:
+
+- **Demo Notebook:** [GitHub Repository](https://github.com/qdrant/demo-colpali-optimized)
+- **Webinar Walkthrough:** [Watch Here](https://www.youtube.com/live/_h6SN1WwnLs?si=n8gwiIjJ5dnfucXC)
+
+[Join the community](https://discord.com/invite/qdrant) and share your results!
+
+---