mirror of
https://github.com/qdrant/landing_page.git
synced 2026-09-27 06:58:30 +02:00
Removed-Milvus
Per Arun's request, removed the 2 mentions of Milvus
This commit is contained in:
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ LMOS architecture powering AI agent collaboration and lifecycle management in a
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Qdrant? Finding the Right Vector Database for LMOS
|
||||
|
||||
When Deutsche Telekom began searching for a scalable, high-performance vector database, they faced operational challenges with their initial choice, Milvus. Seeking a solution better suited to their PaaS-first approach and multitenancy requirements, they evaluated alternatives, and [Qdrant](https://qdrant.tech/qdrant-vector-database/) quickly stood out.
|
||||
When Deutsche Telekom began searching for a scalable, high-performance vector database, they faced operational challenges with their initial choice. Seeking a solution better suited to their PaaS-first approach and multitenancy requirements, they evaluated alternatives, and [Qdrant](https://qdrant.tech/qdrant-vector-database/) quickly stood out.
|
||||
|
||||
"I was looking for open-source components with deep technical expertise behind them," Arun recalls. "I looked at Qdrant and immediately loved the simplicity, [Rust-based efficiency](https://qdrant.tech/articles/why-rust/), and [memory management capabilities](https://qdrant.tech/articles/memory-consumption/). These guys knew what they were doing."
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Deutsche Telekom's engineers also cited several standout features that made Qdra
|
||||
2. **Developer experience**—libraries, multi-language clients, and cross-framework support make integrations seamless.
|
||||
3. **WebUI & Collection Visualization**—engineers found Qdrant's [built-in collection visualization](https://qdrant.tech/documentation/web-ui/) tools highly useful.
|
||||
|
||||
As part of their evaluation, Deutsche Telekom engineers compared multiple solutions, weighing operational simplicity and reliability. One engineer summarized their findings: "Qdrant has way fewer components. Milvus required Kafka, Zookeeper, and only had a hot standby for its index and query nodes. If you rescale Milvus, you get downtime. Qdrant stays up."
|
||||
As part of their evaluation, Deutsche Telekom engineers compared multiple solutions, weighing operational simplicity and reliability. One engineer summarized their findings: "Qdrant has way fewer components, compared to the previous solution that required required Kafka, Zookeeper, and only had a hot standby for its index and query nodes. If you rescaled it, you get downtime. Qdrant stays up."
|
||||
|
||||
### Scaling AI at Deutsche Telekom & The Future of LMOS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user