mirror of
https://github.com/qdrant/landing_page.git
synced 2026-10-06 11:28:31 +02:00
Update case-study-lettria-v2.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
title: "Scaled Vector + Graph Retrieval: How Lettria Unlocked 20% Accuracy Gains with Qdrant and Neo4j"
|
||||
title: "Scaled Vector & Graph Retrieval: How Lettria Unlocked 20% Accuracy Gains with Qdrant and Neo4j"
|
||||
short_description: "Lettria sees 20% accuracy increase by blending Qdrant's vector search and Neo4j's knowledge graphs."
|
||||
description: "Discover how Lettria combined Qdrant and Neo4j to overcome the accuracy limitations of traditional vector-only RAG systems, significantly boosting precision, explainability, and performance in regulated industries like pharma, legal, and aerospace."
|
||||
preview_image: /blog/case-study-lettria/social_preview_partnership-lettria.jpg
|
||||
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The challenge arises in concurrent environments where multiple ingest processes
|
||||
*Pseudocode example: ingest_graph_attempt*
|
||||
|
||||
```py
|
||||
def ingest_graph_attempt(graph_data, qdrant, neo4j):
|
||||
def ing est_graph_attempt(graph_data, qdrant, neo4j):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Attempts to ingest graph data into Qdrant and Neo4j consistently.
|
||||
If Neo4j write fails, Qdrant changes are rolled back.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user